Record Atlas
Flags of the Netherlands

Family research · Phase 6b of the world atlas

Flags of the Netherlands

From Rome-adjacent Batavi and Frisii tribes on the Rhine delta's edge, through a later patchwork of feudal counties with no shared banner, a Burgundian-Habsburg union, an eighty-year war of secession, a genuine Golden Age republic, three distinct Napoleonic-era governments in under twenty years, a treaty-built kingdom that lost its southern half within fifteen years, and a five-year wartime occupation — eleven political entities, and a red-white-blue tricolor that keeps reappearing, sometimes orange, on the other side of every rupture.

The Dutch tricolor is older than it looks: it started life orange-white-blue (the "Prince's Flag," after William of Orange) during the Revolt, and was gradually replaced by red over the 17th century — because orange is less visible at sea, according to the Royal House of the Netherlands, or because the Republic was moving away from the House of Orange, according to Wikipedia, well before the French Revolution gave most of Europe the idea of a national tricolor at all.

Scope of this page: the lands of present-day Netherlands, c. 50 BCE–present, eleven political entities. Belgium and Luxembourg — part of the same Burgundian-Habsburg bloc until 1581, and reunited with the Netherlands twice more after that — have their own pages; see the shared map and the linked pages at the bottom.

One country, ten changes of flag

Modern Netherlands' own territory, unlike Belgium next door, was never durably split along an internal line after 1581 — the Union of Utrecht's seven founding provinces and the later "Generality Lands" are a real distinction, but a fiddly and largely administrative one that never produced a solidified internal border worth drawing on a map. So this map is honest about it: one region, the country's real traced outline, changing color only when the government actually ruling it changed. Press play, or drag the slider.

No invented internal split. A separate flags-of-the-provinces map would be its own project. What's shown here is the real outline of the Netherlands from public geographic data, recolored at each of the nine moments the ruling authority over the whole territory actually changed — including three changes of government inside a single twenty-year stretch, 1795–1815.
c. 50 BCE
BELGIUM GERMANY NETHERLANDS
Batavi & Frisii Tribes of the Rhine Delta

Real traced country outline (simplified from public geographic data), recolored by era — not an internal partition.

How we know this. 12 of 12 eras on this page carry an evidence panel (8 attested, 1 emblem only, 2 no flag known, 1 not yet checked). Only the ones marked attested are confirmed by the sources named under them; where sources disagree or a claim could not be confirmed, the panel says so.
red–white–blue, the colours fixed by royal decree in 1937
1945 – present

Kingdom of the Netherlands

Sovereign kingdomWilhelminaSecular (no state religion)
Migration & conquest:Immigration: Dutch-Indonesian repatriates & Moluccans (1949–51)Immigration: Turkish & Moroccan guest workers (1960s–)Immigration: Surinamese migration around independence (1975)
Ruling house:House of Orange-Nassau

Who & why: liberation reaches the last occupied Dutch territory in May 1945, restoring the constitutional monarchy under Queen Wilhelmina. The postwar decades bring the loss of Indonesia after a bitter independence war (1945–49), founding membership of NATO (1949) and the European project from the 1950s onward, and Suriname's independence in 1975 — the kingdom's overseas map shrinking even as its European core prospers.

What it represents: the same red-white-blue tricolor flown since the Republic. A royal decree of 19 February 1937 (no. 93) fixed its colours as red, white and blue. Sources disagree on whether the decree also named the shades, vermilion and cobalt blue, or whether that came in 1958 — see how we know this below.

Attestedhow we know this

A royal decree of 19 February 1937, no. 93, fixed the colours of the flag of the Kingdom as red, white and blue; FOTW and Wikipedia both quote it that way. The Royal House says the colours were bright vermilion and cobalt blue.

Not established: The sources disagree on the shade: FOTW dates 'bright vermilion and cobalt blue' to 1958, while the Royal House page gives that wording as the decree's own. The decree text itself has not been read. The hex swatches on this page are approximations, not a specification.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal horizontal bands.
LayoutRed top, white middle, blue bottom.
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the occupying power's own flag over Dutch soil, not a Dutch flag (schematic, not to exact spec)
1940 – 1945

Reichskommissariat Niederlande (German occupation)

Occupied territoryArthur Seyss-InquartNo official state religion
Migration & conquest:Occupied by: Nazi Germany (1940–45)Emigration: deportation of Dutch Jews to Nazi camps (1942–44)

Who & why: Germany invades on 10 May 1940 without a declaration of war; the bombing of Rotterdam on 14 May forces capitulation the next day. Queen Wilhelmina and the government flee to London, while Arthur Seyss-Inquart governs as Reichskommissar. Persecution of the Dutch Jewish population escalates through deportations from 1942; a national railway strike in support of the Allied advance in 1944–45 triggers a German transport blockade and the "Hunger Winter," which kills roughly 20,000 civilians.

What it represents: the Dutch tricolor remained the national flag but its use was restricted by the occupiers, and from 1940 any demonstrative act in favour of the House of Orange was punishable. The flag shown is the occupying power's own, schematically — not a Dutch flag. Which restrictions fell on the tricolour itself, and when, is not established here.

Attestedhow we know this

FOTW, citing Poels in Vexilla Nostra 198 (1995), says the tricolour stayed the national flag but its use was restricted by the occupiers. NOS reports that from 1940 any demonstrative act for the House of Orange was punishable. Wikipedia (Reichskommissariat Niederlande): 1940-1945, the Reichskommissariat's infobox flag is the German Reich flag. Neerlandia (1957): during the occupation friends of the occupier often used the orange-white-blue as the Dutch flag, devaluing the old Prince's flag.

Not established: The Reich flag as the occupier's flag and the tricolour remaining nominally the national flag under restriction are both stated, but no ordinance was found, so which restrictions fell on the tricolour and when is not established; no source supports a ban in 1943. The page's drawing is the occupier's flag, schematically.

Paint guide
ProportionsNot applicable — the occupying power's flag, not a Dutch one.
LayoutShown schematically for historical documentation only.
unchanged red–white–blue, now flown over a smaller kingdom
1830 – 1940

Kingdom of the Netherlands (post-secession)

Sovereign kingdomWilliam INo official state religion
Migration & conquest:Emigration: to the United States (1840s–1920s)
Ruling house:House of Orange-Nassau

Who & why: Belgium's August 1830 revolution and the failed Ten Days' Campaign of 1831 cost the kingdom its southern provinces; the 1839 Treaty of London formalizes the new borders, including Luxembourg's partition (see the Low Countries hub). William I abdicates in 1840; his successors preside over a slow shift from royal authority toward parliamentary government — the constitution of 1848 curbs the crown's power after a wave of European revolutions — and the country stays neutral through the First World War.

What it represents: no change to the flag at all; the same tricolor that flew over the larger union keeps flying over the smaller kingdom that remains, the clearest visual sign that the Dutch state itself considered 1830 a loss of territory rather than a rupture in its own continuity.

Not yet checked against sourceshow we know this

FOTW (nl.html): the red-white-blue tricolour was the flag of the Kingdom of the Netherlands 1813-1940; the flag was adopted formally only by Order in Council of 19 February 1937 (no earlier law). Wikipedia (Flag of the Netherlands): the 1937 decree states 'The colours of the flag of the Kingdom of the Netherlands are red, white and blue' and was prompted by orange-white-blue flags promoted by the NSB. Wikipedia (United Kingdom of the Netherlands): the Belgian Revolution broke out 25 August 1830, Belgium declared independence 4 October 1830 and the Dutch recognised it on 19 April 1839; the article says nothing about the flag.

Not established: No source states that the flag was unchanged through the 1830 secession or describes its status 1830-1937; the continuity rests on FOTW's one-line statement that the tricolour was the kingdom's flag from 1813 to 1940.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal horizontal bands.
LayoutRed top, white middle, blue bottom.
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the same tricolor, now flying over a treaty-built union of three countries
1813 – 1830

United Kingdom of the Netherlands

Sovereign kingdomWilliam INo official state religion
Ruling house:House of Orange-Nassau

Who & why: as French power collapses, William VI of Orange returns from exile in England and is proclaimed "Sovereign Prince" on 1 December 1813. The Congress of Vienna then builds a stronger buffer state against France: on its terms, William is crowned King William I in March 1815 and formally merges his realm with the former Austrian Netherlands (Belgium) and Luxembourg that June, creating a single kingdom across all three — cross-reference the Low Countries hub for the full three-country picture.

What it represents: the historic Dutch tricolor, unchanged through the transition from French rule to independent principality to enlarged kingdom — the flag's continuity masking a genuinely new and much larger state underneath it.

Attestedhow we know this

Wikipedia reports 1813 newspapers describing red-white-blue flags with orange pennants and solid orange flags, and says the question of the national flag was left undecided; its statement that William preferred red-white-blue is marked 'citation needed' there. The Royal House confirms independence returned in 1813 but says nothing about the flag. FOTW: the red-white-blue tricolour was the flag of the Kingdom of the Netherlands (1813-1940 and 1945-now) and the southern Netherlands were united with it 1815-1830. Wikipedia (United Kingdom of the Netherlands): kingdom 1815-1839 with the Flag of the Netherlands as infobox flag. Neerlandia (1957): in 1813 both red-white-blue and orange-white-blue flew from the gables.

Not established: The tricolour's use is attested by several sources, but the formal national status was undecided in 1813 per Wikipedia and no source describes an 1815 decree; FOTW notes there is no law before the 1937 decree. The page's 'treaty-built union of three countries' is not examined.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal horizontal bands.
LayoutRed top, white middle, blue bottom.
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the French tricolor, flown over the whole country outright
1810 – 1813

French Empire (direct annexation)

Annexed territoryNapoleon BonaparteNo official state religion (Concordat toleration)

Who & why: frustrated that his brother Louis was protecting Dutch trade from the Continental System's blockade of Britain, Napoleon forces Louis's abdication and annexes the former Kingdom of Holland directly into the French Empire on 9 July 1810, dividing it into French départements (Zuiderzee, Bouches-de-l'Yssel, Frise, and others). Direct rule ends when Cossack cavalry, part of the wider collapse following Napoleon's Russian campaign, reach the country in November 1813 and the population rises against the French garrison.

What it represents: no separate Dutch flag at all for these three years — the French tricolor itself, flown as it was over every other department of the Empire, the only period in this whole timeline when the Netherlands has no flag of its own whatsoever.

Attestedhow we know this

The Royal House says the Netherlands was annexed by France in 1810 and the national flag was replaced by the French imperial standard. Wikipedia says the national flag was replaced by imperial emblems in 1810, without a citation there.

Not established: Which French flag flew on Dutch buildings is not established; 'imperial standard' may not be the plain tricolour drawn here. Wikipedia's own Kingdom of Holland page gives the annexation date inconsistently.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal vertical bands.
LayoutBlue hoist, white middle, red fly.
Blue#002395
White#F4EFE1
Red#AE1C28
the tricolor kept, now under a French-installed king
1806 – 1810

Kingdom of Holland

Client kingdomLouis BonaparteNo official state religion

Who & why: Napoleon installs his younger brother Louis Bonaparte as king on 5 June 1806, hoping for a more pliable and useful satellite than the fractious Batavian Commonwealth had proven. Louis surprises Napoleon by governing in genuinely Dutch interests — learning the language, moving the capital to Amsterdam, and resisting enforcement of the Continental System against Dutch merchants — earning his own brother's growing fury and eventual removal.

What it represents: the red-white-blue tricolor continued as the kingdom's flag, without the Batavian navy's Maiden emblem. Louis proposed adding quartered arms to the navy's flag and withdrew the proposal when the navy would not accept it.

Attestedhow we know this

The tricolour continued under Louis Bonaparte. Wikipedia dates the flag without the Maiden to 5 June 1806 (no citation there), records naval crews rioting over the flag in August 1806 and a royal decree of 1 December 1807 affirming the Statenvlag for the navy (both citing de Jonge, 1831). FOTW says Louis proposed adding quartered arms to the navy's flag and withdrew the proposal when the navy would not accept it.

Not established: The 5 June 1806 date has no primary source behind it in either reference. The motive this page used to state ('a deliberate choice to present continuity') had no source and was removed.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal horizontal bands.
LayoutRed-white-blue; royal arms centered on state occasions (simplified here).
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the tricolor; from 1796 the navy’s flag carried the Dutch Maiden in the upper-left corner (schematic)
1795 – 1806

Batavian Republic

RepublicPieter PaulusNo official state religion
Migration & conquest:Emigration: Orangist exiles fleeing to Britain & Germany (1795–)

Who & why: French Revolutionary troops cross the frozen rivers in January 1795, and Stadtholder William V flees to England as the Patriot movement, radicalized allies of the French, proclaims the Batavian Republic on 19 January 1795. A 1798 constitution creates a unitary state for the first time, ending the old provincial confederation; internal factional strife eventually leads Napoleon to reorganize the government into the more centralized Batavian Commonwealth under Grand Pensionary Rutger Jan Schimmelpenninck from 1805.

What it represents: the republic kept the red-white-blue tricolor. In 1796 the navy’s flag gained an emblem in its upper-left corner: the Dutch Maiden and the Lion holding a spear topped with a liberty cap (Dirk Langendijk’s design, Rijksmuseum RP-T-00-1753). It was removed in 1806.

Attestedhow we know this

Dirk Langendijk's design in the Rijksmuseum shows the Dutch Maiden and the Lion holding a spear topped with a liberty cap, in the upper-left corner of the existing flag, for the Batavian navy, effective 1 March 1796. FOTW, citing Wilson (1986, p. 60), puts the decree altering the navy's flags (not the merchant flags) on 14 February 1796; the States General publication Wikipedia cites carries the same date.

Not established: The emblem was on the navy's flag only. Its removal in 1806 is Wikipedia's, without a citation. FOTW also describes a tricolour 'with a small white canton' (credited to Roy Stilling, 1996), which we have not reconciled with the Maiden emblem. This page used to describe a 'canton with a liberty cap used briefly 1795-96'; that is not what the sources show.

Paint guide
Proportions2:3, three equal horizontal bands.
LayoutRed-white-blue; the navy’s flag carried the Maiden emblem in the upper-left corner from 1796 to 1806. The drawing is a schematic of it.
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the Statenvlag, red-white-blue — the flag the Republic settled on, and the direct ancestor of the modern Dutch tricolour
c. 1650 – 1795

Dutch Republic — the Statenvlag

RepublicWilliam of Orange (William the Silent)Dutch Reformed Christianity (public church)
Migration & conquest:Immigration: Sephardic Jewish refugees from IberiaImmigration: Huguenot refugees from France (post-1685)
Ruling house:House of Orange-Nassau

Who & why: the northern provinces sign the Union of Utrecht on 23 January 1579 as a mutual-defense pact against Spain, then go further with the Act of Abjuration on 26 July 1581, formally renouncing Philip II. Spain doesn't formally recognize the loss until the Treaty of Münster, part of the Peace of Westphalia, on 30 January 1648. In between comes the Dutch Golden Age — the VOC founded in 1602, colonial and trading footholds from Batavia to New Amsterdam to Nagasaki, and the art of Rembrandt and Vermeer — alongside real internal strain, including a First Stadtholderless Period (1650–72) and the catastrophic French invasion of the 1672 "Rampjaar."

What it represents: the same republic, under the flag it ended up with. Red replaced the orange band gradually, between about 1630 and 1660, and the flag was named the Statenvlag in 1664; it is the direct ancestor of the flag the Netherlands uses today. The split from the Prince's Flag here is a change of cloth, not of state — the Republic is one era in every other respect, and the two are separated because a reader scanning flags would otherwise see one where there were two.

Attestedhow we know this

Red replaced orange gradually. Wikipedia places the transition between about 1630 and 1660, with red appearing as early as 1596-97 (its infobox and text differ), the name Statenvlag in 1664 (de Jonge, 1833, p. 75) and the navy always flying it after 1663 (de Waard, 1900). The Royal House says red gradually replaced orange during the 17th century because orange is less visible at sea. Wikipedia gives the Republic's distance from the House of Orange as the reason.

Not established: No decree for the change was found, so 'c. 1650' is the midpoint of a transition, not an event. This page used to say the flag flew over the VOC and WIC fleets, New Amsterdam and Batavia; no source for that was found and it was removed.

Paint guide
ProportionsNo fixed civil ratio recorded; roughly 2:3 in practice.
LayoutRed top, white middle, blue bottom (originally orange-white-blue, 1579–c.1630s).
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the Prinsenvlag, orange-white-blue — orange for William of Orange, who led the Revolt
1581 – c. 1650

Dutch Republic — the Prinsenvlag

RepublicWilliam of Orange (William the Silent)Dutch Reformed Christianity (public church)
Migration & conquest:Immigration: Sephardic Jewish refugees from IberiaImmigration: Huguenot refugees from France (post-1685)
Ruling house:House of Orange-Nassau

Who & why: the northern provinces sign the Union of Utrecht on 23 January 1579 as a mutual-defense pact against Spain, then go further with the Act of Abjuration on 26 July 1581, formally renouncing Philip II. Spain doesn't formally recognize the loss until the Treaty of Münster, part of the Peace of Westphalia, on 30 January 1648. In between comes the Dutch Golden Age — the VOC founded in 1602, colonial and trading footholds from Batavia to New Amsterdam to Nagasaki, and the art of Rembrandt and Vermeer — alongside real internal strain, including a First Stadtholderless Period (1650–72) and the catastrophic French invasion of the 1672 "Rampjaar."

What it represents: the Revolt's own banner, orange for William of Orange who led it. The colours are attested from the 1570s; whether the Sea Beggars carried them at Den Briel in 1572 is uncertain. This era starts at the Act of Abjuration of 1581, not at the flag's first appearance.

When it changed, and why nobody can date it: red replaced the orange band gradually across roughly 1630–1660, and we found no decree for the change — which is why this entry and the next are dated «c. 1650» rather than to a year. Two explanations are given, and they do not exclude each other: the Royal House of the Netherlands says orange is less visible at sea than red, and Wikipedia says the Republic was moving away from the House of Orange. Both flags were in use at once for decades; this atlas splits them where the balance tipped, and says so rather than inventing a date.

Attestedhow we know this

Orange-white-blue is attested from the 1570s. Wikipedia cites Rey (1837) for use by the Prince of Orange then, Jacob Duym for officers' brassards at the siege of Leiden in 1574, an order of the Admiralty of Zeeland of 1587 for naval flags in these colours, and de Waard (1900) for the navy flying it from 1588 to 1630. The Royal House dates the first reference to 1572; FOTW says it was used from the second half of the 16th century and named for William of Orange.

Not established: Wikipedia calls it uncertain whether the Sea Beggars carried the colours at Den Briel in 1572, so this page no longer says it flew from the Sea Beggars onward. The era starts at the Act of Abjuration (1581), not at the flag's first appearance. The earliest colour image, of 1575 in Jan van Hout's album, is on Wikipedia without a reference we could read.

Paint guide
ProportionsNo fixed civil ratio recorded; roughly 2:3 in practice.
LayoutRed top, white middle, blue bottom (originally orange-white-blue, 1579–c.1630s).
Red#AE1C28
White#F4EFE1
Blue#21468B
the Burgundy Cross (raguly saltire), simplified from the knotted original
1433 – 1581

Burgundian / Habsburg Netherlands

Personal union / duchyPhilip the GoodRoman Catholicism
Migration & conquest:Emigration: Protestant refugees fleeing Spanish persecution (1560s–70s)
Ruling house:House of Valois-BurgundyHouse of Habsburg

Who & why: Philip the Good, Duke of Burgundy, secures Holland, Zeeland, and Hainaut in 1433 after a long conflict with his cousin Jacqueline of Bavaria, folding them into the wider Burgundian bloc that already included Flanders and Brabant (see the Low Countries hub). The line passes to the Habsburgs on Mary of Burgundy's marriage in 1477; her grandson Charles V, born in Ghent in 1500, adds Guelders, Utrecht, Overijssel, Groningen, and Frisia by the 1520s–40s, then formalizes the whole "Seventeen Provinces" as one indivisible inheritance in the 1549 Pragmatic Sanction. His son Philip II's heavy taxation and religious persecution provoke the revolt that ends this era in 1581.

What it represents: the Burgundy Cross — a red diagonal saltire of knotted, raguly branches on white, the personal emblem of the Burgundian dukes — used across the whole Burgundian-Habsburg realm rather than as a flag specific to the northern provinces alone; the same design that continues over the southern Netherlands (future Belgium) after 1581.

Emblem, not a flaghow we know this

The Cross of Burgundy was the emblem of the Burgundian dukes (Hutchinson, 2007, as cited on Wikipedia). It is drawn here as the emblem, not as a flag of the northern provinces.

Not established: Its use as a flag across the Habsburg Netherlands after 1477 is stated on Wikipedia without a citation and has not been confirmed.

Paint guide
ProportionsNo fixed ratio recorded.
LayoutWhite field, red diagonal saltire of knotted branches (shown simplified as plain diagonals).
White#F4EFE1
Red#A3272A
NO FLAG DOCUMENTED
placeholder maroon field — fragmented feudal era, no shared flag existed
c. 1000 – 1433

Fragmented medieval counties

Feudal patchworkNo single ruler documentedRoman Catholicism

Who & why: what is now the Netherlands was a patchwork of separate feudal territories with no shared ruler: the County of Holland (formally named from 1101), the County of Zeeland, the prince-bishopric of Utrecht, the Duchy of Guelders, and the fiercely independent Frisian lands, which recognized no feudal overlord at all under the tradition of "Frisian freedom" until a Saxon conquest in 1498. Each had its own count, bishop, or assembly, its own coinage, and its own local banners.

What it represents: no single flag existed for this territory because no single polity did; each county or lordship used its own heraldic devices rather than a shared national symbol. Shown here honestly blank rather than invented, ending when Philip the Good began assembling Holland, Zeeland, and Hainaut under one Burgundian hand in 1433.

No flag knownhow we know this

No single polity existed, so there is no flag to attest; the maroon field is a placeholder.

Paint guide
ProportionsN/A — no single attested flag for the territory as a whole.
NO FLAG DOCUMENTED
placeholder — no unified banner; tribal standards went unrecorded by Roman writers
c. 50 BCE – 800 CE

Batavi & Frisii Tribes of the Rhine Delta

Fragmented / tribal territoriesGaius Julius CivilisGermanic paganism (until 8th c. Christianization)
Migration & conquest:Allied/subordinated to: Rome (foederati status, then 69 CE revolt)Absorbed by: Frankish realm (7th–8th c.)

Who & why: for centuries before medieval Dutch feudal governance, this same delta was home to distinct Germanic tribal peoples on the edge of the Roman world. Julius Caesar's Gallic Wars and Tacitus's Germania and Histories both describe the Batavi, settled on the Rhine's "island" (roughly the modern Betuwe), and the Frisii, along the coast to the north. Rome treats the Batavi as favored allies rather than conquered subjects, exempt from tribute in exchange for supplying elite auxiliary cavalry to the legions; that special status collapses in 69–70 CE, when the Batavian nobleman Gaius Julius Civilis leads a major revolt against Rome during the "Year of the Four Emperors," briefly threatening the entire Rhine frontier before Roman forces restore control. Frisii territory further north remains only loosely under Roman influence and is never durably annexed; the whole region is absorbed piecemeal into the Frankish realm over the following centuries, with Frisian resistance to Frankish rule and to Christianization only ending under Charles Martel and Charlemagne in the 8th century.

What it represents: no flag survives from this era, and none is likely to have existed in any modern sense — Tacitus (Histories 4.22) describes the Batavian-led force following images of wild beasts brought out of woods and sacred groves, not woven banners. Shown here honestly blank rather than invented.

World context: this span runs alongside the height of the Roman Empire from Augustus through Trajan and Hadrian (Rome's borders reaching their greatest extent around 117 CE), the eruption of Vesuvius and destruction of Pompeii in 79 CE, and, by its end, Charlemagne's own 800 coronation as Holy Roman Emperor in Rome — the same event that closes the parallel Germanic Tribes era covered on this atlas's Germany page, of which the Batavi and Frisii were themselves a part.

No flag knownhow we know this

Tacitus (Histories 4.22) describes the force under Civilis following images of wild beasts brought out of woods and sacred groves, and names the Batavian elite and 'German allies'. He describes no flag.

Not established: This page used to say Tacitus records Batavian and Frisian war-standards; the passage names the Batavians and unnamed German allies, not the Frisii.

Paint guide
ProportionsN/A — no attested tribal flag.

Reading the tags

Personal union / duchy — feudal or dynastic, foreign overlord
Republic — sovereign or client, no monarch
Client kingdom — monarch installed by a foreign power
Annexed territory — ruled directly from a foreign capital
Sovereign kingdom — independent monarchy, own crown
Occupied territory — wartime foreign administration
Leader — the named ruler most associated with the era's start
State religion — the official/established faith, not the population's

More of the atlas

This page is one lineage in a larger set. See the region-wide map and the other countries here:

Compiled from Wikipedia, Flags of the World (fotw.info / crwflags.com), and Britannica. Colors are close historical approximations for painting reference; pre-19th-century swatches are informed reconstructions, not official specifications. Map outline is a simplified trace of public geographic data, not surveyed.