Record Atlas
Belgium · France · United States of America · Spain

Cuypers

Cuypers, also written Kuyper, Kuypers, Cuijpers. Attested in Belgium, France, United States of America, Spain, borne by about 4,211 people in the registers this map holds.

Also written

A person linked these — Wikidata's «said to be the same as», or a family archive that worked it out from documents.

KuyperKuypersCuijpers

The same name, spelt two ways

One systematic substitution — s for z, w for v, ch for h — where BOTH spellings are independently attested surnames. Kosina and Kozina are one man in two clerks' handwriting. Stronger than sounding alike, weaker than somebody having checked.

Cuipers

Only sounds alike

An algorithm's guess. Useful for casting a net, and not evidence.

CupersCypersCuepersCüppers

What Wikidata says this name is

Copied from Wikidata, not worked out here. It is crowd-sourced and wrong in places, which is why the item is linked below rather than the claim simply repeated.

  • Dutch the language of the name

    Which is not where a family is from. A Polish surname can be borne by people whose forebears never saw Poland, and often is.

  • Read about it on Wikipedia ↗ an article, with its own sources

Q1146752 on Wikidata ↗ — the item every line above came from.

Where it came from

No place of this name is in the gazetteer, so this map says nothing about where the name came from. Search a surname anywhere else and you will be told an origin — that it is Latin, or Italian, or means «joyful». That is etymology, it is usually unsourced, and it is a different question from the one answered here.

Where it is borne, and where a record names it

Attested in 4 countries: Belgium, France, United States of America, SpainSpain — 27 peopleUnited States of America — 114 peopleFrance — 288 peopleBelgium — 3,782 people
A dot is a country, not a place. It sits at the country's centre because a national register counts a country; nothing here says where in it these people are. Blank is not absence. This draws the 4 countries where the eleven registers and eight archives behind this atlas attest the name. Most of the world has no surname register this project can read, and the ones that do and will not are listed with the reason.
Belgium, by commune. 3,782 people in 183 of Belgium's 565 communes, counted by Statbel. The biggest is Antwerpen with 216. Only the 150 commonest are drawn; 33 more communes hold a few each. This is the only country here that can be drawn this way — every other register counts a country and stops, so a blank elsewhere is a gap in what states publish, not in the name.
150 places drawn, the largest being Antwerpen, Tessenderlo-Ham, Scherpenheuvel-Zichem, Lommel, Hasselt, Retie, Balen, Aarschot, Mol, Peer, with 33 smaller ones omittedHeusden-Zolder — 24Herentals — 24Putte — 24Maaseik — 25Kinrooi — 25Brasschaat — 25Riemst — 26Oostende — 28Schoten — 29Vosselaar — 30Arendonk — 30Oudsbergen — 34Nijlen — 34Gent — 36Stabroek — 36Pelt — 39Sint-Truiden — 40Genk — 42Meerhout — 44Lier — 47Leuven — 49Tongeren-Borgloon — 50Heist-op-den-Berg — 52Mechelen — 55Bilzen-Hoeselt — 56Beringen — 56Laakdal — 59Diest — 60Hechtel-Eksel — 62Geel — 63Peer — 66Mol — 70Aarschot — 71Balen — 75Retie — 79Hasselt — 81Lommel — 100Scherpenheuvel-Zichem — 134Tessenderlo-Ham — 135Antwerpen — 216

Country by country

Each country below can carry up to three different kinds of evidence, and none of them is the same claim. A register is a head-count — a state counted these people. A record is one document naming the surname on that ground, narrower evidence and often much older. And a volume overlapping these dates is a document from the right place and years — never a document known to name this surname. None of the three ever means the name exists in that country and nowhere else, or that it exists nowhere but here.

Belgium

3,782 Borne — a state counted them — Family names by municipality, 1 January 2026 (Statbel, TA_POP_LST_2026).

Whose archive to write to

11,130 of 24,426 volumes held for Belgium overlap the 1870s, 1890s, 1900s, 1950s, 1960s and 1990s — the decades Cuypers is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names Cuypers. The commonest kinds: Civil registration and vital records, Cemeteries and burials. See everything this atlas holds for Belgium →

France

288 Borne — a state counted them — Fichier des noms de famille 1891–2000 (INSEE, fichier national).

Whose archive to write to
Attested here, and nothing that survives covers those years

Cuypers is attested in France in the 1940s. Not one of the 1,513 volumes this atlas holds for France covers those years — worth knowing before an afternoon is spent on France's shelf rather than after.

United States of America

114 Borne — a state counted them — Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2010 Census.

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Cuypers in United States of America, so it cannot narrow United States of America's 528,875 volumes by date — see United States of America's own page for all of it.

Spain

27 Borne — a state counted them — Frecuencia de apellidos, Censos de población (INE).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Cuypers in Spain, so it cannot narrow Spain's 35,936 volumes by date — see Spain's own page for all of it.

When it was being born, in France

INSEE counts births by surname and decade from the état civil, 1891 to 2000 — the only dated evidence in this dataset. A name that starts at zero and climbs arrived; a name that falls to nothing left, died out, or emigrated, and the decade it stops is the decade to stop searching. It counts births registered in France, so a family that emigrated in 1900 simply stops appearing, which is information rather than a defect.

  • 1891–1900 8
  • 1901–1910 12
  • 1911–1920 14
  • 1921–1930 21
  • 1931–1940 20
  • 1941–1950 41
  • 1951–1960 45
  • 1961–1970 26
  • 1971–1980 36
  • 1981–1990 42
  • 1991–2000 23

Whose archive held that ground, and when

Every surname site can tell you a name is common somewhere. This one also knows which filing system held that ground in which years — and those are the two halves of one question: my people were called this, they were there, so who has the paper, and for which century. A name in Croatia before 1881 may sit in a military series and not a county one; a name in the Netherlands before 1811 has no civil record at all, only a baptism.

This is about the ground, not about your family. A register counting a name in a country says nothing about which village. And these are the pieces of a country this atlas has drawn, which in a large one may be a corner of it — Acadia reaches into Maine and is not a statement about the United States, and Bohemia's ground crosses into Poland. Each region's own page says which ground it covers. Where a country is missing below, nothing covers it yet.

Belgium
France
United States of America

No record region is drawn yet for Spain — which is a gap in this atlas and not a statement about that country.

Find Cuypers on the map →

The surname dataset · CC0, and downloadable