Record Atlas
Belgium · France · Spain · Poland · Denmark

De Wit

De Wit, also written De Witt, Dewit, White. Attested in Belgium, France, Spain, Poland, Denmark, borne by about 3,437 people in the registers this map holds.

Also written

A person linked these — Wikidata's «said to be the same as», or a family archive that worked it out from documents.

De WittDewitWhite

The same name, spelt two ways

One systematic substitution — s for z, w for v, ch for h — where BOTH spellings are independently attested surnames. Kosina and Kozina are one man in two clerks' handwriting. Stronger than sounding alike, weaker than somebody having checked.

De Vitde With

Only sounds alike

An algorithm's guess. Useful for casting a net, and not evidence.

DawitDewetDewiteDewithDewittde Wet

What Wiktionary says this name is

Copied from the surname template on Wiktionary, not worked out here, and not from its etymology prose. Anyone may edit it; the page and the revision it was read at are linked below.

  • Dutch recorded as a surname in these languages

    A language here is the language of the NAME, not a country a family came from — the same caveat the Wikidata section carries, and worth repeating rather than assumed read.

De Wit on Wiktionary ↗ — read at revision 81731132. Text from Wiktionary, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0.

It is also the name of a place

2 places drawn, the largest being De Witt, WhiteWhite — 724De Witt — 5,242
Where those places are. A dot is a settlement whose name is this surname, sized by its population — not a claim that anybody of the name lives there. Phonetic neighbours are listed below but not drawn: putting a machine's guess on the ground would dress it up as geography.

This is as close to an origin as this map will go. A surname that is also a place name often came from it — and often did not: plenty are occupations or patronymics that happen to collide with a place, and plenty of places are named after a family rather than the other way round. It is a fact with a source, which is more than an etymology page offers.

  • De Witt United States of America pop. 5,242 a spelling of the name
  • White United States of America pop. 724 a spelling of the name
  • DeWitt United States of America pop. 4,655 only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling

Where it is borne, and where a record names it

Attested in 5 countries: Belgium, France, Spain, Poland, DenmarkDenmark — attested, not countedPoland — 5 peopleSpain — 193 peopleFrance — 205 peopleBelgium — 3,034 people
A dot is a country, not a place. It sits at the country's centre because a national register counts a country; nothing here says where in it these people are. A hollow ring is attested but not counted — Denmark publishes which surnames exist and not how many carry each, and a family archive finds a name without counting heads. Sizing those by a number nobody published would invent it. Blank is not absence. This draws the 5 countries where the eleven registers and eight archives behind this atlas attest the name. Most of the world has no surname register this project can read, and the ones that do and will not are listed with the reason.
Belgium, by commune. 3,238 people in 181 of Belgium's 565 communes, counted by Statbel. The biggest is Antwerpen with 194. Only the 150 commonest are drawn; 31 more communes hold a few each. This is the only country here that can be drawn this way — every other register counts a country and stops, so a blank elsewhere is a gap in what states publish, not in the name.
150 places drawn, the largest being Antwerpen, Mechelen, Aalst, Puurs-Sint-Amands, Dendermonde, Gent, Willebroek, Zemst, Bornem, Beveren-Kruibeke-Zwijndrecht, with 31 smaller ones omittedBrasschaat — 6Schoten — 7Bornem — 8Duffel — 22Rumst — 22Buggenhout — 23Boortmeerbeek — 23Bonheiden — 23Brasschaat — 23Lommel — 24Beringen — 25Schoten — 25Putte — 26Ninove — 27Antwerpen — 27Aartselaar — 27Vilvoorde — 28Meise — 28Dilbeek — 28Meerhout — 28Edegem — 28Tremelo — 29Lier — 31Londerzeel — 32Grimbergen — 35Sint-Katelijne-Waver — 35Heist-op-den-Berg — 36Sint-Niklaas — 38Mortsel — 38Kapelle-op-den-Bos — 41Leuven — 46Tessenderlo-Ham — 47Lebbeke — 50Beveren-Kruibeke-Zwijndrecht — 55Bornem — 56Zemst — 62Willebroek — 72Gent — 84Dendermonde — 85Puurs-Sint-Amands — 94Aalst — 107Mechelen — 133Antwerpen — 194

Country by country

Each country below can carry up to three different kinds of evidence, and none of them is the same claim. A register is a head-count — a state counted these people. A record is one document naming the surname on that ground, narrower evidence and often much older. And a volume overlapping these dates is a document from the right place and years — never a document known to name this surname. None of the three ever means the name exists in that country and nowhere else, or that it exists nowhere but here.

Belgium

3,034 Borne — a state counted them — Family names by municipality, 1 January 2026 (Statbel, TA_POP_LST_2026).

Whose archive to write to

11,076 of 24,426 volumes held for Belgium overlap the 1830s, 1860s, 1880s, 1950s and 1970s — the decades De Wit is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names De Wit. The commonest kinds: Civil registration and vital records, Cemeteries and burials, Church and parish registers. See everything this atlas holds for Belgium →

France

205 Borne — a state counted them — Fichier des noms de famille 1891–2000 (INSEE, fichier national).

Whose archive to write to

419 of 1,513 volumes held for France overlap the 1720s, 1780s, 1830s, 1850s, 1880s, 1910s, 1920s, 1940s, 1960s, 1970s and 2000s — the decades De Wit is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names De Wit. The commonest kinds: Civil registration and vital records, Church and parish registers, Censuses and population lists, Probate, land and notarial. See everything this atlas holds for France →

Spain

193 Borne — a state counted them — Frecuencia de apellidos, Censos de población (INE).

Whose archive to write to

5,869 of 35,936 volumes held for Spain overlap the 1780s, 1860s, 1960s, 1970s and 2000s — the decades De Wit is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names De Wit. The commonest kinds: Church and parish registers, Probate, land and notarial, Immigration and emigration, Civil registration and vital records. See everything this atlas holds for Spain →

Poland

5 Borne — a state counted them — Nazwiska występujące w rejestrze PESEL (z uwzględnieniem osób zmarłych).

Whose archive to write to

6,586 of 15,686 volumes held for Poland overlap the 1820s, 1860s and 1880s — the decades De Wit is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names De Wit. The commonest kinds: Church and parish registers, Civil registration and vital records, Cemeteries and burials, Probate, land and notarial. See everything this atlas holds for Poland →

Denmark

Borne — a state counted them — Navne registreret i Danmark, January 2020 (Danmarks Statistik, republished by Digitaliseringsstyrelsen).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for De Wit in Denmark, so it cannot narrow Denmark's 4,099 volumes by date — see Denmark's own page for all of it.

When it was being born, in France

INSEE counts births by surname and decade from the état civil, 1891 to 2000 — the only dated evidence in this dataset. A name that starts at zero and climbs arrived; a name that falls to nothing left, died out, or emigrated, and the decade it stops is the decade to stop searching. It counts births registered in France, so a family that emigrated in 1900 simply stops appearing, which is information rather than a defect.

  • 1891–1900 2
  • 1901–1910 6
  • 1911–1920 16
  • 1921–1930 20
  • 1931–1940 21
  • 1941–1950 15
  • 1951–1960 28
  • 1961–1970 19
  • 1971–1980 29
  • 1981–1990 27
  • 1991–2000 22

Whose archive held that ground, and when

Every surname site can tell you a name is common somewhere. This one also knows which filing system held that ground in which years — and those are the two halves of one question: my people were called this, they were there, so who has the paper, and for which century. A name in Croatia before 1881 may sit in a military series and not a county one; a name in the Netherlands before 1811 has no civil record at all, only a baptism.

This is about the ground, not about your family. A register counting a name in a country says nothing about which village. And these are the pieces of a country this atlas has drawn, which in a large one may be a corner of it — Acadia reaches into Maine and is not a statement about the United States, and Bohemia's ground crosses into Poland. Each region's own page says which ground it covers. Where a country is missing below, nothing covers it yet.

  • Pomerania and Danzig 7 eras Duchy of Pomerania → Swedish Pomerania in the west; Brandenburg-Prussia in the east → Prussia → German Empire → …
  • Bohemia 6 eras Kingdom of Bohemia → Austria → Czechoslovakia → Sudetenland and the Reichsprotektorat → …
  • Posen — Prussian Poland 8 eras Poland → Prussia → Duchy of Warsaw → German Empire → …
  • Galicia 6 eras Kingdom of Galicia–Volhynia → Poland → Austria → German and Soviet occupation → …
  • Moravia and Silesia 6 eras Margraviate of Moravia → Austria → Czechoslovakia → Reichsprotektorat Böhmen und Mähren → …
  • East Prussia 4 eras State of the Teutonic Order → Duchy, then Kingdom, of Prussia → German Empire → Russia in the north; Poland in the south; Lithuania at Memel
  • Silesia 6 eras Habsburg Bohemian crown lands → Prussia → German Empire → Divided → …
  • Congress Poland — the Russian partition 7 eras Russian Empire → Duchy of Warsaw → Kingdom of Poland, in personal union with Russia → Poland, restored → …
  • Denmark 4 eras Denmark–Norway → Denmark, after the loss of Norway → Prussia, then the German Empire → Denmark

No record region is drawn yet for Spain — which is a gap in this atlas and not a statement about that country.

Find De Wit on the map →

The surname dataset · CC0, and downloadable