Record Atlas
Spain · United States of America · France · Belgium · Denmark

Tato

Tato. Attested in Spain, United States of America, France, Belgium, Denmark, borne by about 4,467 people in the registers this map holds.

The same name, spelt two ways

One systematic substitution — s for z, w for v, ch for h — where BOTH spellings are independently attested surnames. Kosina and Kozina are one man in two clerks' handwriting. Stronger than sounding alike, weaker than somebody having checked.

Tatto

Only sounds alike

An algorithm's guess. Useful for casting a net, and not evidence.

TatTateTatiTattTatuTetoTitoToto

What Wiktionary says this name is

Copied from the surname template on Wiktionary, not worked out here, and not from its etymology prose. Anyone may edit it; the page and the revision it was read at are linked below.

  • Galician recorded as a surname in these languages

    A language here is the language of the NAME, not a country a family came from — the same caveat the Wikidata section carries, and worth repeating rather than assumed read.

Tato on Wiktionary ↗ — read at revision 89801772. Text from Wiktionary, by its contributors, under CC BY-SA 4.0.

It is also the name of a place

This is as close to an origin as this map will go. A surname that is also a place name often came from it — and often did not: plenty are occupations or patronymics that happen to collide with a place, and plenty of places are named after a family rather than the other way round. It is a fact with a source, which is more than an etymology page offers.

  • Tāti India pop. 12,878 only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling
  • Tát Hungary pop. 5,575 only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling
  • Toto India pop. 5,237 only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling
  • Tito Italy pop. 4,237 only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling
  • Tate United States of America only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling
  • Tatu United States of America only a phonetic neighbour, not a spelling

Where it is borne, and where a record names it

Attested in 5 countries: Spain, United States of America, France, Belgium, DenmarkDenmark — attested, not countedBelgium — 14 peopleFrance — 53 peopleUnited States of America — 192 peopleSpain — 4,208 people
A dot is a country, not a place. It sits at the country's centre because a national register counts a country; nothing here says where in it these people are. A hollow ring is attested but not counted — Denmark publishes which surnames exist and not how many carry each, and a family archive finds a name without counting heads. Sizing those by a number nobody published would invent it. Blank is not absence. This draws the 5 countries where the eleven registers and eight archives behind this atlas attest the name. Most of the world has no surname register this project can read, and the ones that do and will not are listed with the reason.
Belgium, by commune. 14 people in 2 of Belgium's 565 communes, counted by Statbel. The biggest is Schaarbeek with 9. This is the only country here that can be drawn this way — every other register counts a country and stops, so a blank elsewhere is a gap in what states publish, not in the name.
2 places drawn, the largest being Schaarbeek, Knokke-HeistKnokke-Heist — 5Schaarbeek — 9

Country by country

Each country below can carry up to three different kinds of evidence, and none of them is the same claim. A register is a head-count — a state counted these people. A record is one document naming the surname on that ground, narrower evidence and often much older. And a volume overlapping these dates is a document from the right place and years — never a document known to name this surname. None of the three ever means the name exists in that country and nowhere else, or that it exists nowhere but here.

Spain

4,208 Borne — a state counted them — Frecuencia de apellidos, Censos de población (INE).

Whose archive to write to

7,428 of 35,936 volumes held for Spain overlap the 1850s, 1920s, 1950s, 1960s and 1970s — the decades Tato is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names Tato. The commonest kinds: Church and parish registers, Probate, land and notarial, Civil registration and vital records, Immigration and emigration. See everything this atlas holds for Spain →

United States of America

192 Borne — a state counted them — Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2010 Census; Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2000 Census.

Whose archive to write to

461,054 of 528,875 volumes held for United States of America overlap the 1760s, 1830s, 1840s, 1850s, 1860s, 1880s, 1890s, 1900s, 1910s, 1920s, 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s, 1990s, 2000s and 2010s — the decades Tato is attested here. Too many to list, and this atlas does not know whether any one of them names Tato. The commonest kinds: Probate, land and notarial, Civil registration and vital records, Immigration and emigration, Censuses and population lists. See everything this atlas holds for United States of America →

France

53 Borne — a state counted them — Fichier des noms de famille 1891–2000 (INSEE, fichier national).

Whose archive to write to

10 of 1,513 volumes held for France overlap the 1900s, 1920s, 1930s, 1940s and 2000s — the decades Tato is attested here. None is known to name Tato: a volume overlapping these years is a document from the right place and time, not a confirmed match. Worth an afternoon.

Belgium

14 Borne — a state counted them — Family names by municipality, 1 January 2026 (Statbel, TA_POP_LST_2026).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Tato in Belgium, so it cannot narrow Belgium's 24,426 volumes by date — see Belgium's own page for all of it.

Denmark

Borne — a state counted them — Navne registreret i Danmark, January 2020 (Danmarks Statistik, republished by Digitaliseringsstyrelsen).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Tato in Denmark, so it cannot narrow Denmark's 4,099 volumes by date — see Denmark's own page for all of it.

When it was being born, in France

INSEE counts births by surname and decade from the état civil, 1891 to 2000 — the only dated evidence in this dataset. A name that starts at zero and climbs arrived; a name that falls to nothing left, died out, or emigrated, and the decade it stops is the decade to stop searching. It counts births registered in France, so a family that emigrated in 1900 simply stops appearing, which is information rather than a defect. This name's first French births fall in 1921–1930 and its last in 1991–2000.

  • 1891–1900 —
  • 1901–1910 —
  • 1911–1920 —
  • 1921–1930 4
  • 1931–1940 3
  • 1941–1950 —
  • 1951–1960 —
  • 1961–1970 13
  • 1971–1980 7
  • 1981–1990 17
  • 1991–2000 9

Whose archive held that ground, and when

Every surname site can tell you a name is common somewhere. This one also knows which filing system held that ground in which years — and those are the two halves of one question: my people were called this, they were there, so who has the paper, and for which century. A name in Croatia before 1881 may sit in a military series and not a county one; a name in the Netherlands before 1811 has no civil record at all, only a baptism.

This is about the ground, not about your family. A register counting a name in a country says nothing about which village. And these are the pieces of a country this atlas has drawn, which in a large one may be a corner of it — Acadia reaches into Maine and is not a statement about the United States, and Bohemia's ground crosses into Poland. Each region's own page says which ground it covers. Where a country is missing below, nothing covers it yet.

United States of America
France
Belgium
Denmark
  • Denmark 4 eras Denmark–Norway → Denmark, after the loss of Norway → Prussia, then the German Empire → Denmark

No record region is drawn yet for Spain — which is a gap in this atlas and not a statement about that country.

Find Tato on the map →

The surname dataset · CC0, and downloadable