Record Atlas
Slovenia · United States of America · Denmark

Buljubašić

Buljubašić. Attested in Slovenia, United States of America, Denmark, borne by about 453 people in the registers this map holds.

The spellings of Buljubašić

This is the one list the atlas keeps of which spellings are the same name, and what each rests on. Case, spacing, hyphens and apostrophes are not counted as separate spellings, so De Franceschi and Defranceschi are one form. An accent is: a priest's Lereña is not a clerk's Lerena.

Searching for this name? Try every one of: Buljubašić · Buljubasic

The same family

One record, or the family's own tree, writes one person or family both ways.

  • Buljubašić this page
    what it rests on
    • The spelling the archive's own tree uses for this family (1 rows). Croatia · Batalage · 1878 · the Blažević family archive

Met on this line's records

Met on a record of this family's line by the archive that read it.

  • Buljubasic
    what it rests on
    • The tree writes the family's name this way on 6 rows. Croatia · Batalage · 1882 · the Blažević family archive

What Wikidata says this name is

Copied from Wikidata, not worked out here. It is crowd-sourced and wrong in places, which is why the item is linked below rather than the claim simply repeated.

Q30324490 on Wikidata ↗ — the item every line above came from.

On the map

  • A country that counted the name
  • Attested by a register, not counted

Where it is borne, and where a record names it. A dot is a country, not a place. It sits at the country's centre because a national register counts a country; nothing here says where in it these people are. A dashed ring is attested by a register but not counted — Denmark publishes which surnames exist and not how many carry each. Sizing those by a number nobody published would invent it. Blank is not absence. This draws the 3 countries where the eleven registers and eight archives behind this atlas attest the name. Most of the world has no surname register this project can read, and the ones that do and will not are listed with the reason.

Where it came from

No place of this name is in the gazetteer, so this map says nothing about where the name came from. Search a surname anywhere else and you will be told an origin — that it is Latin, or Italian, or means «joyful». That is etymology, it is usually unsourced, and it is a different question from the one answered here.

Country by country

Each country below can carry up to three different kinds of evidence, and none of them is the same claim. A register is a head-count — a state counted these people. A record is one document naming the surname on that ground, narrower evidence and often much older. And a volume overlapping these dates is a document from the right place and years — never a document known to name this surname. None of the three ever means the name exists in that country and nowhere else, or that it exists nowhere but here.

Slovenia

269 Borne — a state counted them — Family names, Slovenia, 2026 (SURS tables 05X1015S–05X1018S).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Buljubašić in Slovenia, so it cannot narrow Slovenia's 2,132 volumes by date — see Slovenia's own page for all of it.

United States of America

184 Borne — a state counted them — Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2010 Census; Frequently Occurring Surnames from the 2000 Census.

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Buljubašić in United States of America, so it cannot narrow United States of America's 688,143 volumes by date — see United States of America's own page for all of it.

Denmark

Borne — a state counted them — Navne registreret i Danmark, January 2020 (Danmarks Statistik, republished by Digitaliseringsstyrelsen).

Whose archive to write to

This atlas has no birth-year evidence for Buljubašić in Denmark, so it cannot narrow Denmark's 23,346 volumes by date — see Denmark's own page for all of it.

Whose archive held that ground, and when

Every surname site can tell you a name is common somewhere. This one also knows which filing system held that ground in which years — and those are the two halves of one question: my people were called this, they were there, so who has the paper, and for which century. A name in Croatia before 1881 may sit in a military series and not a county one; a name in the Netherlands before 1811 has no civil record at all, only a baptism.

This is about the ground, not about your family. A register counting a name in a country says nothing about which village. And these are the pieces of a country this atlas has drawn, which in a large one may be a corner of it — Acadia reaches into Maine and is not a statement about the United States, and Bohemia's ground crosses into Poland. Each region's own page says which ground it covers. Where a country is missing below, nothing covers it yet.

  • Prekmurje — the Hungarian Mur-land 8 eras Kingdom of Hungary → Royal Hungary → Habsburg → Austria–Hungary → …
  • Central Istria 8 eras Aquileia → Habsburg → Napoleonic → Austria–Hungary → …
  • Kastav, Opatija and the Liburnian coast 7 eras Lords of Walsee at Kastav; estates of the Patriarchs of Aquileia on the coast → Habsburg lordship of Kastav; Habsburg Istria → Illyrian Provinces → Austria-Hungary: Austrian Littoral → …
  • Carniola and the Slovene lands 8 eras Inner Austria → Austria → The Illyrian Provinces → Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, then Yugoslavia → …

Find Buljubašić on the map →

The surname dataset · CC0, and downloadable